In order to formulate rules to curb misuse of the power of attorney mode in the sale of immovable property, the Supreme Court had summoned, among others, the chief secretaries and revenue secretaries of Delhi, Haryana, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh to provide their views and suggestions on the case before the court. Earlier order
The State of Punjab then filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court, which was dismissed on July 30, 2012. The State of Punjab then filed a review petition in which notice was issued vide order dated October 31, 2013. Around 58 other petitions were connected with this review petition by the Supreme Court.
In Molvi Tamizuddin Khan case, the Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice Mohammad Munir backed Governor General Ghulam Mohammad's action to dissolve the first Constitutional Assembly. This judgement of Supreme Court is always strongly criticized by all democratic parties of Pakistan and is referred as a root cause of unstable democracy in Pakistan.
WELCOME to Case Status System of Punjab and Haryana High Court Select Your Search Parameter from Left Side Menu Designed and Developed by National Informatics Centre Contents Published and Managed by Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
12/04/2019 Order of the Supreme Court of India in the matter of The State of Rajasthan Vs State of Punjab & Others dated 12/04/2019 regarding physical possession of irrigation headworks at Ropar, Harike and Firozepur under Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB).
(For taking action against the Govt. of Sindh thr. IGP, Sindh on entering into contract for purchase of the Armed Personnel Carrier at an exorbitant rate without calling open tender in deviation of Sindh Public Procurement Rules).
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday pulled up the CBI for failing to frame charges even after a gap of 6 years in a mining case registered against former Karnataka minister and mining baron Gali Janardhana Reddy, who had moved the apex court seeking permission to visit Ballari to see his father-in-law recuperating from a health condition and currently admitted in the ICU of a local hospital.
Mar 05, 2019· A 30-year-old man was booked for allegedly bursting firecrackers in east Delhi despite a Supreme Court ban on selling and burning of old stock, the first such case to be registered since the ...
While announcing a new initiative we welcome you to the new website of the Supreme Court of India (sci.gov.in / supremecourt.gov.in). We intend to provide a dynamic, responsive website – a portal to disseminate real time complete information about the cases to be progressively updated, to all the stakeholders in the Indian Judiciary.
Jan 08, 2019· Indeed you are eligible, initially Hon'ble High Court Calcutta relying upon the decision of State of Karnataka vs Uma Devi was not passing such order of regularisation, but in June 2014 the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed a judgment that the rest similarly situtiated employees be should be regularised, provided they meet the requirement of ...
Pension Case Notification at Court Orders; Feb 28 Speaking Order by the complaint cell -- Restoration of Commuted Portion of Pension; Jan 30. Pension Notification; 2014. Pay Allowances. Jul 22. Implementation of Supreme Court's order dated 31-03-2014 regarding restoration of pension Jul 18. Grant of Increase in Pension to Civil Pensioners of Punjab
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO. 120 OF 2012 ... upon mining and using its most abundant, affordable and dependant energy supply – which is coal. Coal is extremely important element ... order to provide for the regulation of mines and the development of minerals, the Mines and Minerals ...
3. Main contention of Punjab government against grant of benefit (of increases on restored pension) is that the benefit ordered by Federal government, in compliance of High Court orders, upheld by Supreme Court, relates to federal government employees alone, and was / is not applicable to the Punjab government employees.
The Government of the Punjab has also issued the Notification of Restoration of Commuted Portion of Pension for the Punjab Govt pensioners vide Notification No. FD-SR-III/4-41/2008 dated 22 nd July 2014.. In this Notification, there is a mention of the decision of the Supreme Court of Pakistan dated 31-03-2014, so on the demand of the many visitors of this website, I am publishing the copies ...
3. The issue that was required to be adjudicated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court was whether all the private respondents, against whom an order-of recovery (of the excess amount) has been made, should be exempted in law, from the reimbursement of the same to the employer.
Application to MA in Law, Politics and Society in Ambedkar University, Delhi is open till 24 June. Apply here. Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience.Free for one month and pay only if you like it. and pay only if you like it.
A status quo was however again ordered by the Supreme Court relating to the land on 30 November. On 22 February 2017, the Supreme Court stated that the Government of Punjab will have to abide by its order on construction of SYL canal and will pass a decree if the governments of Punjab and Haryana failed to come to an agreement.
The vast majority of cases filed in the Supreme Court are disposed of summarily by unsigned orders. Such an order will, for example, deny a petition for certiorari without comment. Regularly scheduled lists of orders are issued on each Monday that the Court sits, but "miscellaneous" orders may be issued in individual cases at any time.